Categories For a Literary Analysis Essay

Categories For a Literary Analysis EssayStudying literary analysis is done by reading books that study the subject and evaluating the worth of those subjects. A good book will give you insight into the topic. This is the best way to categorize the given topics for a literary analysis essay as strong or weak. All other factors such as how the topic is written, how it is presented, the authors, the way the topic is edited etc are secondary to this important element.The intellectual side of the subject is the first one to check if the topic has validity in the field. For example, if there is an argument on the class-based debate format to test a thesis, then this is a good idea. However, if the entire discussion is on the merits of each book, then you have fallen prey to a weak topic that needs strong argument.The factual side of the subject also comes into play here. If the book is completely analytical without giving any information to support its argument, then you have chosen a weak topic. For example, if a book argues that Shakespeare and Milton are the greatest poets who ever lived, you can count on it being an argumentative book. On the other hand, if it discusses how Milton was the father of all English poets, or the notion that Shakespeare was only a playwright, etc, then the discussion would be solid enough to hold its own against an analytical book.The subject should be chosen with the reader in mind, which means if you want to read a book on aviation history and the author uses quotation from various aircraft engines and airliners, then he is giving the reader an opinion on the subject. If you read the book and say, 'The whole engine is amazing', he is giving the reader an opinion, but his opinion would be only on the basis of the airplane engine. Thus, you have a solid knowledge of the topic if you only consider the content and not the genre. The more information you get about the topic, the better off you are.The logical side of the subject also play s a key role here. For example, if you are writing an essay on a book on football, you have to place the argumentative book in the same category as the analytical one. For example, if the book analyzes the teams, then the book with arguments on a club would be in the same category as the book with statistical analysis. And the same logic holds true if you are writing a book on literary analysis, the book that analyzes literature has to follow the same logic as the book that analyzes drama.The book must be very interesting and the theme must be complete so that it can encourage the reader to continue reading and to be able to finish the book in an appropriate manner. There are many books that do this, and thus, categorizing them as strong or weak is not hard.The topic must be relevant to the overall argument of the book and that too in a meaningful way. If the subject is totally irrelevant, then the reader will not buy into the argument of the book. The logic must also be sound in th at the book must tell the reader something that is valuable and that too in a clear manner. Thus, categorizing the given topics for a literary analysis essay as strong or weak is easy.

Sartre`s Existentialism Essays - Philosophy, French People

Sartre`s Existentialism Jean-Paul Sartre . . . the name is one of the most popular in modern philosophy. But who was he? What did he write and what were his works about? What was his role with regard to Existentialism? What is Existentialism, really? What life influences affected the person as whom he became famous? How would Sartre assess various social topics that we face today? What are the problems with Sartre's view of Existentialism and existence in general? These are the questions addressed in the following pages of this brief dissertation. His life Upon reviewing several sources, it is apparent that Sartre was a very disorganized and inconsistent individual. Sartre was obsessed with his intellect to the point of abandon of all else in his life - personal hygiene, honesty, organization, thoroughness, and more. It seems that he felt he was of superior intelligence in comparison to all others who surrounded him. He was not necessarily a great and original thinker, but rather a superb media sensation of sorts. Rather than developing Existentialist thought, he merely promoted it to amazing popularity through his eccentric lifestyle. Although he is best known for his association with Existentialism, it is interesting to note that he denounced its principles later in life and adopted Marxism, which he also later denounced. Jean-Paul-Charles-Aymard Sartre was born in Paris on June 21, 1905, the only child of Anne-Marie Schweitzer Sartre and Jean-Baptiste Sartre. Anne-Marie was the first cousin of Albert Schweitzer, the famed Nobel Peace Prize recipient, and the daughter of Karl Schweitzer, who had published texts on religion, philosophy, and languages. Jean-Baptiste was the son of Eymard Sartre, a doctor who had written several medical texts. Although his philosophy would deny it, it may have been fated that Jean-Paul would himself become a famous writer; it was in his genes. Jean-Baptiste and Anne-Marie were deeply in love. They married on May 5, 1904. Jean-Baptiste was enlisted in the French Navy and was away on an assignment when Jean-Paul was born 13 months later. Sadly, hardly more than a year after the birth of their son, Jean-Baptiste had returned home from China in November only to fall ill in March and die on September 17, 1906. After the death of Jean-Baptiste, Anne-Marie moved herself and her young son into her father's house, the Schweitzer home. Karl Schweitzer was a strict and domineering man and the year the two spent living there affected Sartre's life forever. His mother kept his hair long and dressed him in effeminate clothing, probably as a means of escaping the oppressive nature of her father. Schweitzer, however, disgusted by the child's appearance, took him to the barber one day and had his hair cut. Jean-Paul's ugliness then became apparent. Without the cloak of long hair and frilly clothes, his short stature, one eye that looked askance (from a juvenile illness), and awkward appearance were undeniable, even to his mother. He was ostracized by other children for his appearance. He was an outcast. At the age of eight he began to write scripts when he received puppets from his mom. Children tolerated him in order to be entertained by his shows. He basked in the attention. He began a pattern of outrageous behavior that it seems he believed would earn him popularity. Apparently it worked. In October of 1913, Eymard Sartre died and Jean-Paul fell under near complete control of the Schweitzers. When war broke out in 1914, it fascinated Sartre, and he wrote some short stories about it. In 1915 Jean-Paul was enrolled at Lycee Henri IV, a highly regarded school. Here he found children he could relate to: intellectually stimulating and of his class level, children who could respect him for himself. Yet, even at this early age, it was apparent to his teachers that Jean-Paul did not hone any of his thoughts; his intelligence was apparent, but he merely skimmed over many subjects without delving into any in depth. His mother remarried when he was twelve, to the apparent disapproval of Jean-Paul. The new family moved to LaRochelle in 1917, but after Sartre got into trouble on several occasions, he was returned to Lycee Henri IV where he was a boarding student. At this time he became close with Paul-Yves Nizan, a quiet and shy boy of considerable intellect. Where Sartre was disorganized, slovenly, and incomplete, Nizan was orderly, stylish, and thorough. Nizan was prone to fits of depression and drinking, to the fascination of Sartre. The two were nearly inseparable throughout college and beyond. In 1922 the two enrolled