Informative Synthesis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Informative Synthesis - Essay Example However, the anticipated environmental concerns and possible health and life threatening effects are consistently increasing the international organizations’ condemnation on the eminent nuclear energy in Iran. Indeed, the nuclear reactors tragedy in Fukushima Japan brought severe and lifetime effects that proved to be dangerous and inevitable (Greenpeace 1). However, the significance of this critical subject hails from the fact that the host nation is a minority nation with more economical interests than human or global security concerns. Iran is indeed not in any way ready to compromise its quest in this project. Actually, the urge to make their dream for a nuclear source of energy has only grown more real. Additionally, Iran has been concealing a ploy to develop uranium enrichment in its territories. Indeed, Iran produced 215 billion kWh gross in 2008 generating a per capita consumption of about 2000 kWh/yr. Out of these production, 80% of its electricity was from gas and 16 .5% from oil. In fact, the nuclear energy reactor started up in Iran on 8 May 2011 through September 2011 after many years of construction and many consistent efforts against ever increasing international opposition. With 75 % production capacity realized in March, the prospects of the project oversee the project entering commercial operation about April 2012 (World Nuclear Association 1). Subject to these developments, the international organizations like the UN Security council and international governments like the US institute sanctions, trade barriers, and diplomatic withdrawals against Iran with a hope of convincing or even coercing Iran to compromise on its pursuit for Nuclear energy (UN Security council 1-12). However, despite the stringent terms, Iran has not shown any signs of giving in to international pressure where they prioritize their economic interests on nuclear energy before international interests. This puts to question the mode of decision-making that Iranian lea dership adopts on matters of global concern like the nuclear energy. The significance of international pressure on nuclear energy in Iran is a relevant issue on the University of Alabama student. I addressing this topic, I will focus on opinion articles, "Only Crippling Sanctions Will Stop Iran" of March 2, 2012 by Emanuele Ottolenghi and "Starving Iran Won't Free It† March 2, 2012  by Hooman Majd. The article, "Only Crippling Sanctions Will Stop Iran" of March 2, 2012 by Emanuele Ottolenghi is however more effective in that it draws the history of important Iranian decisions, how Iranians value sanctions, what drives the Iranians to change and the respect accorded to the Iranian government by the Iranians. This will help in analyzing the effect of the international sanctions against nuclear energy in Iran. Emanuele holds the opinion that the western allies assume that Iran’s leaders are rational actors, and rely on cost-benefit analyses to reach important decision (O ttolenghi 1). Hence, they assume that their continued gradual increase in the costs of Iran’s nuclear pursuit will lead to Tehran concession in the current nuclear standoff between the western decision makers and the Iranian decision makers. They expect the Iranian decision makers to behave rationally agree to a compromise and ignore Iran’s perspective on costs already incurred, the price of completing the journey and the advantages of turning back subject to the continued international pressure (Ottolenghi 1). The Iranian decision makers do not necessarily behave as assumed by the Western decision makers. History shows that the Iran’s decision makers are impervious to cost-benefit analysis and have never been isolationists. Hooman recognizes the fact that coercion, sanctions or exiles and their enablers